It is my learning process

Sunday, 19 October 2008

Formulary for a New Urbanism (IVAN CHTCHEGLOV, 1953)

Formulary for a New Urbanism
  • Darkness and obscurity are banished by artificial lighting, and the seasons by air conditioning. Night and summer are losing their charm and dawn is disappearing. The urban population think they have escaped from cosmic reality, but there is no corresponding expansion of their dream life. The reason is clear: dreams spring from reality and are realized in it.
  • A new architecture can express nothing less than a new civilization (it is clear that there has been neither civilization nor architecture for centuries, but only experiments, most of which were failures; we can speak of Gothic architecture, but there is no Marxist or capitalist architecture, though these two systems are revealing similar tendencies and goals).
  • Everyone will, so to speak, live in their own personal “cathedrals.” There will be rooms more conducive to dreams than any drug, and houses where one cannot help but love.
  • Finally, to those who object that a people cannot live by drifting, it is useful to recall that in every group certain characters (priests or heroes) are charged with representing various tendencies as specialists, in accordance with the dual mechanism of projection and identification. Experience demonstrates that a dérive is a good replacement for a Mass: it is more effective in making people enter into communication with the ensemble of energies, seducing them for the benefit of the collectivity.

1 comment:

Siu Ching said...

Use the concepts that I oulined to help you think of these places/spaces: striated space (ordered space) and smooth space (places of transformation), place as defined by trajectories, space as a multiplicity, space as made by inter-relations, space as always under construction, voids in the city as places of excess value, the 'plane of consistency' where one multiplicity can meet another, heterotopia (where a possible future is suggested in the meeting of differences).

Then, think of the things you have done, things we have discussed doings - watching reflections, sitting and remembering a person, the ghosts idea at the Mayflower steps, etc.

Can you think of equivalent actions - let's called them "constructed situations" (and what you did today with the Scott building was a good example) - in any of the other places we visited but didn't try anything out for? (Remember to follow the two principles - disruption and repair.)

Once you've got some ideas you're happy with - then think about how you can connect those actions together with things we've already done that you like. Is there an order that works best? How would you travel from one to the next?

Labels

Search This Blog